NST Online Top Stories - Google News |
'99 grand jury indicted Ramseys in JonBenet's death - USA TODAY Posted: 25 Oct 2013 08:32 AM PDT A Colorado grand jury in 1999 voted to indict John and Patsy Ramsey on two counts each of child abuse resulting in the death of their 6-year-old daughter, JonBenet, according to grand jury documents released Friday, but did not directly accuse the couple of killing her. The grand jury also voted to charge that the couple helped whoever killed their daughter, but did not name any suspect for the slaying. The prosecutor in the case refused to sign the grand jury indictment or prosecute the couple, saying that prosecutors did not have sufficient evidence to file charges in the cases. The four pages of documents were released Friday by a Colorado judge in response to a lawsuit by Daily Camera reporter Charlie Brennan and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. The Ramseys consistently maintained their innocence in the 1996 death of JonBenet, whose body was found in the basement of their Boulder, Colo., home. No suspect has ever been tried in the case. Patsy Ramsey died in 2006. John Ramsey remarried in 2011. Only two counts -- a total of four pages -- from the grand jury documents were released. The documents named John and Patsy Ramsey separately, but the wording was identical. John Ramsey: Read the indictment Patsy Ramsey: Read the indictment Count four said the Ramseys "did unlawfully, knowingly, recklessly and feloniously permit a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation which posed a threat of injury to the child's life or health, which resulted in the death of JonBenét Ramsey, a child under the age of sixteen." Count seven of the indictment said the Ramseys did "unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously render assistance to a person, with intent to hinder, delay and prevent the discovery, detention, apprehension, prosecution, conviction and punishment of such person for the commission of a crime, knowing the person being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of murder in the first degree and child abuse resulting in death." The documents however did not name any individual as being suspected of the first-degree murder mentioned in the counts. The body of JonBenet, who was strangled and bludgeoned to death, was discovered in the basement several hours after the Ramseys had called police to report her missing. A ransom note was also recovered. Former Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter, who had convened the grand jury in 1999, refused to sign the indictment after months of presenting evidence in the case. "I and my prosecutorial team believe we do not have sufficient evidence to warrant the filing of charges against anyone who has been investigated at this time," Hunter said at the time. In addition to maintaining their innocence, the Ramseys offered a $100,000 reward for the killer and mounting a newspaper campaign seeking evidence. In 2008, then-District Attorney Mary Lacy said that DNA evidence suggested that the killer was a stranger, not a family member, adding that "justice dictates that the Ramseys be treated only as victims of this very serious crime." Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner said the case remains open but it's not an active investigation. He predicted the indictment's release wouldn't change anything. "Given the publicity that's been out there, many people have formed their opinions one way or another," he said. Contributing: Associated Press |
GOP lawmakers threaten subpoena over ObamaCare rollout information - Fox News Posted: 25 Oct 2013 08:44 AM PDT A group of Republican lawmakers on Thursday threatened to subpoena records about the botched ObamaCare website rollout after a Capitol Hill hearing where contractors behind the site claimed the government failed to properly test the system before launch. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and other GOP committee leaders sent letters to 11 of the largest recipients of contracts to design and implement HealthCare.gov seeking an explanation of the contracts awarded, communications between the companies and the White House and a detailed list of all meetings related to the launch of ObamaCare. The lawmakers said the committee would consider using "compulsory process" if the companies did not respond to the request for information by 5 p.m. on Friday. "It is crucial that you provide information quickly because of the serious concerns about data security related to the lack of testing," the lawmakers wrote, referring to reports that the federal health care website went through little, if any, testing. The letters to contractors were also signed by House Oversight Subcommittee Chairmen John Mica, R-Fla., Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, James Lankford, R-Okla., Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. The contractors faced tough questioning Thursday from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, who voiced frustration with the weeks-long problems surrounding the federal hub. Lawmakers cast doubt on attempts by contractors, who were paid millions, to claim they were not responsible for many of the site's problems. Top contractor CGI Federal revealed it was paid $290 million in taxpayer funds. But CGI Federal and other contractors repeatedly claimed that overall "end-to-end" testing was the responsibility of an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services, as was the decision to go live on Oct. 1. They suggested more time was needed to work out the -- major -- kinks. Representing contractor QSSI, Andrew Slavitt told the committee that ideally, end-to-end testing should have occurred well before the launch, with enough time to correct flaws. "Months would be nice," said Slavitt. "We would have loved to have months," concurred CGI vice president Cheryl Campbell, though she earlier claimed no amount of testing could have flagged all the problems. Questioned whether there were concerns the site was not ready to go live, she also said: "It was not our position to tell our client whether they should go live or not go live." Slavitt said his firm did share concerns with the agency, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, adding they were responsible for addressing them. "We identified errors in code that was provided to us by others," he said. "In this function we reported back the results to CMS and the relevant contractor, who in turn was responsible for fixing coding errors or making any necessary changes." He also blamed in part a "late decision" to require customers to register before browsing for insurance, which could have helped overwhelm the registration system. "This may have driven higher simultaneous usage of the registration system that wouldn't have otherwise occurred if consumers could window-shop anonymously," he said. CMS officials, in a conference call later in the day, acknowledged that there should have been more testing, but said there wasn't due to the "compressed" timeframe. They also claimed responsibility for the decision to make people fully log on before browsing for insurance. The hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee was the first of what is likely to be many on the failures of the main ObamaCare website. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who skipped Thursday's hearing for an event in Phoenix, is expected to testify next Wednesday. The Associated Press contributed to this report. FOX NEWS FIRST NEWSLETTERDaily must-read stories from the biggest name in politics |
You are subscribed to email updates from Top Stories - Google News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
0 ulasan:
Catat Ulasan