Selasa, 11 Jun 2013

NST Online Top Stories - Google News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

NST Online Top Stories - Google News


Contractor fires Snowden from $122000 per year job - USA TODAY

Posted: 11 Jun 2013 07:43 AM PDT

Contractor fires Snowden from $122,000 per year job

Edward Snowden, an intelligence contractor based in Hawaii, told 'The Guardian' newspaper why he decided to blow the whistle on the NSA's secret surveillance programs.

The consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton issued a statement Tuesday confirming that Edward Snowden, 29, was an employee of the firm for less than 3 months, assigned to a team in Hawaii.

The statement says Snowden had a salary rate of $122,000 -- and was terminated Monday "for violations of the firm's code of ethics and firm policy."

Snowden, a former technical analyst for the CIA, revealed Sunday that he was the source of leaks detailing surveillance efforts involving National Security Agency collection of phone and Internet data. He has said he is hiding in Hong Kong.

In an interview with The Guardian last week, Snowden described a comfortable lifestyle and $200,000 salary from Booz Allen, of McLean, Va., and a home in Hawaii that he shared with a girlfriend. He told the paper his main fear was the U.S. government would come after his family, his friends and his partner.

"I can't in good conscience allow the U.S. government to destroy privacy, Internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they're secretly building," Snowden told the Guardian.

The Booz Allen statement also says:

"News reports that this individual has claimed to have leaked classified information are shocking, and if accurate, this action represents a grave violation of the code of conduct and core values of our firm. We will work closely with our clients and authorities in their investigation of this matter."

{ "js_modules": [{"name": "video"}, {"name": "expandable-photo"}], "assetid": "2411231", "aws": "news/national", "aws_id": "news_national", "blogname": "", "byline":"John Bacon", "contenttype": "story pages ", "seotitle": "Booz-allen-snowden-fired", "seotitletag": "Contractor fires Snowden from $122,000 per year job", "ssts": "news/nation", "taxonomykeywords":"NSA Phone Tracking,Hawaii,United States government,U.S. Central Intelligence Agency,U.S. National Security Agency,Hong Kong", "templatename": "stories/default", "topic":"nsa-phone-tracking", "videoincluded":"no", "excludeTransitionAd":true, "basePageType":"video" }

0) { %>

0) { %>

0) { %>

Nelson Mandela's condition appears grimmer than officially acknowledged - Globe and Mail

Posted: 11 Jun 2013 07:59 AM PDT

With the South African government maintaining a stony silence over Nelson Mandela's deteriorating health, reports filtering out of his Pretoria hospital suggest that his condition is much grimmer than officially acknowledged.

On Tuesday, for the fourth consecutive day, the government refused to disclose any information about the 94-year-old anti-apartheid hero, except to continue repeating the same terse phrase that he is in "serious but stable" condition. Even his hospital location is officially unconfirmed.

But the secrecy appears to be concealing a battle to save Mr. Mandela's life. A report by CBS News, citing an unnamed source, said Mr. Mandela was in a medical "crisis" and had to be resuscitated by a medical team at his home last Friday night, shortly before he was rushed to hospital at about 1:30 a.m.

The report said Mr. Mandela's liver and kidney functions are impaired, working at only 50 per cent of their normal level. It said he was in the hospital's intensive care unit, and had also been treated for a bleeding ulcer.

None of these details have been confirmed or acknowledged by the office of President Jacob Zuma, the only official channel for information on the health of the Nobel Peace Prize laureate.

But the decline in Mr. Mandela's health has been indirectly confirmed by the steady stream of family members visiting him at the Pretoria hospital and holding vigil at his bedside. His wife, Graca Machel, cancelled a trip to London and has remained with him since Friday. His daughter Zenani, the South African ambassador to Argentina, has flown home to be with him. Other children and grandchildren have been visiting him all week, along with his ex-wife, Winnie.

Mr. Zuma's office has been widely criticized for its refusal to disclose more than perfunctory details on the health of Mr. Mandela, who has been admitted to hospital four times since December. In one case last year, his office misled South Africans about the hospital where Mr. Mandela was being treated. In the latest case, Mr. Zuma's office has said only that Mr. Mandela is being treated for a recurring lung infection.

Just a few weeks ago, Mr. Zuma and other members of his ruling African National Congress visited Mr. Mandela at his home in a Johannesburg suburb, and Mr. Zuma later claimed cheerfully that the former president was "up and about" and "looking very good." In fact, video footage from the visit showed Mr. Mandela obviously frail, frozen-faced, unable to smile, and almost unresponsive. It was the only video image of Mr. Mandela to be released in the past 10 months.

Mr. Mandela's fragile health is unsurprising for a man of his age, especially since he had suffered tuberculosis during his 27 years of imprisonment in the apartheid era. And there are growing signs that South Africans are reconciled to his possible imminent death. In some ways, his latest hospital admission has been a bigger story globally than it has in South Africa, where people have become accustomed to his health problems over the years. Though he is beloved by the country, many people now say they are prepared to hear the worst.

In an example of South Africa's gradual acceptance of Mr. Mandela's declining health, one of his former comrades has called on the Mandela family to "release" the former president. "The family must release him so that God may have his own way," said Andrew Mlangeni, a former ANC activist who served years of imprisonment with Mr. Mandela on Robben Island.

"Once the family releases him, the people of South Africa will follow," he told a South African newspaper. "We will say, 'Thank you, God, you have given us this man, and we will release him too.' "

Kredit: www.nst.com.my

Isnin, 10 Jun 2013

NST Online Business Times : latest

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

NST Online Business Times : latest


US stocks finish the day mixed

Posted: 10 Jun 2013 04:54 PM PDT

NEW YORK: US stocks on Monday finished the day mixed after Standard & Poor's raised its outlook for the US debt rating and lacklustre economic data out of China.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 9.53 (0.06 per cent) to 15,238.59.

The broad-based S&P 500 slipped 0.57 (0.03 per cent) to 1,642.81, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index added 4.55 (0.13 per cent) at 3,473.77.

Before trade opened S&P upgraded its debt rating outlook for the United States, saying there is now less than a one-in-three chance for a downgrade in the near term.

S&P cited a somewhat improved US political climate following the year-end 2012 "fiscal-cliff" deal and a US economic environment that should lead the country to "match or exceed its peers in the coming years."

Over the weekend, China reported industrial output in May rose by 9.2 per cent year-on-year, slightly weaker than the 9.3 per cent increase in April.

China's fixed asset investment - a key measure of government spending in the world's second-largest economy - increased 20.4 per cent from January through May compared with last year, slowing from the 20.6 per cent gain in the first four months of the year.

Apple dipped 0.7 per cent after unveiling its iTunes Radio Service as a streaming music competitor to Pandora and Spotify. The launch came at Apple's annual developer conference in San Francisco.

Pandora gained 2.5 per cent.

Yoga attire maker Lululemon Athletica gained 1.0 per cent during the session, but fell 9.1 per cent in after-hours trading after the company announced chief executive Christine Day would step down once a new leader is identified.

Google rose 1.2 per cent following reports the technology giant is close to a deal to acquire Israeli mapping application Waze. Media reports put the size of the deal at $1.0-$1.3 billion.

McDonald's gained 1.3 per cent after reporting that US comparable sales rose 2.4 per cent in May. The fast-food chain's international segments also notched increases.

Agro-tech giant Monsanto rose 4.5 per cent after Macquarie raised the stock to "outperform", Dow Jones Newswires reported. -- AFP

Kredit: www.nst.com.my

NST Online Top Stories - Google News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

NST Online Top Stories - Google News


Ex-CIA worker comes forward as leaker, says he was protecting 'basic liberties' - Chicago Tribune

Posted: 10 Jun 2013 08:36 AM PDT

Michael Cohen, Fellow at The Century Foundation and Columnist for The Guardian, joins UTTM to discuss National Security Administration contractor Edward Snowden claiming responsibility for the agency's intelligence leak.

WASHINGTON -- An ex-CIA worker employed as a contractor at the U.S. National Security Agency said he leaked documents and details of a top secret U.S. surveillance program in order to protect the "basic liberties for people around the world."

Holed up in a hotel room in Hong Kong, Edward Snowden, 29, said he had thought long and hard before publicizing details of an NSA program code-named PRISM, saying he had done so because he felt the United States was building an unaccountable and secret espionage machine that spied on every American.

His whereabouts were not immediately known today. Staff at a luxury hotel in Hong Kong told Reuters that Snowden had checked out.

Snowden, a former technical assistant at the CIA, said he had been working at the super-secret NSA as an employee of contractor Booz Allen. He said he decided to leak information after becoming disenchanted with President Barack Obama, who he said had continued the policies of predecessor George W. Bush.

"I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things ... I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under," he told the Guardian newspaper, which published a video interview with him on its website. The interview was dated June 6.

Both the Guardian and the Washington Post said last week that U.S. security services had monitored data about phone calls from Verizon and Internet data from large companies such as Google and Facebook

James R. Clapper, the director of national intelligence, said Saturday that the Justice Department had launched an investigation of what he called "reckless disclosures of intelligence community measures used to keep Americans safe.

"For me, it is literally — not figuratively — literally gut-wrenching to see this happen because of the huge, grave danger it does to our intelligence capabilities," Clapper said in an interview with NBC.

'I have no intention of hiding'

In naming Snowden on Sunday, the newspapers said he had sought to be identified.

"The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything," Snowden said in explaining his actions.

"With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife's phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards," he said.

"I have no intention of hiding who I am because I know I have done nothing wrong," he was quoted as saying. He said he expected U.S. authorities to "demonize" him and said he planned to "ask for asylum from any countries that believe in free speech and oppose the victimization of global privacy.

In a 12-minute video interview posted on the Guardian website, Snowden wears rimless glasses, short-cropped brown hair and a thin beard.

Snowden identifies himself in the video as an infrastructure analyst at an NSA facility in Hawaii for Booz Allen Hamilton, a major defense contractor. He said he previously worked for the CIA as a systems administrator and telecommunications systems officer.

"I, sitting at my desk, certainly had the authorities to wiretap anyone, from you, or your accountant, to a federal judge, to even the president if I had a personal email," he said.

Snowden said he decided to expose the NSA secrets because "I do not want to live in a society that does these sort of things." He said the agency "collects more digital communications from America than we do from the Russians.

He said he fears authorities "will come after my family, my friends, my partner" because of his actions. The Guardian said he was born in Elizabeth City, N.C., and later he and his family moved to Maryland, near Ft. Meade.

Worked at NSA

The Guardian said Snowden had been working at the NSA for four years as a contractor for outside companies.

George Zimmerman murder trial begins with judge denying delay - Fox News

Posted: 10 Jun 2013 08:29 AM PDT

The trial for George Zimmerman, the Florida neighborhood watch captain accused of murdering teen Trayvon Martin while on patrol, began Monday with the judge denying the defense's request to delay the trial.

Circuit Judge Debra Nelson rejected the request after lead defense attorney Mark O'Mara told the judge his defense team needed several more weeks to prepare.

"We're not fully ready and need more time," O'Mara said.

O'Mara blamed prosecutors for a delay in turning over evidence and said he needs time to interview an attorney for Martin's family. Prosecutors opposed the request for a delay.

Jury selection in the case also started Monday.

A pool of 100 prospective jurors will be separated into groups of 21, with each prospective juror being brought into a room for questioning by the judge, state and defense.

Nelson said the jury selection would alternate with the continuation of a hearing to determine whether she will allow the testimony of voice-recognition experts who say they might be able to identify who was screaming on a 911 tape recorded during Zimmerman's confrontation with Trayvon Martin.

The February 12, 2012, shooting in central Florida sparked a fierce national debate about such issues as gun control, equal justice and race after Zimmerman, who is Hispanic, fatally shot Martin, a black teenager.

There 29-year-old Zimmerman admitted to shooting Martin in the chest with his 9-mm. handgun after calling police, exiting his pickup truck to follow Martin, then getting into a fight with the 17-year-old on a rainy night inside the gated Retreat at Twin Lakes community.

But Zimmerman also says the teen circled back and attacked him as he walked back to his truck – punching him in the face and slamming the back of his head into the sidewalk.

"If there are African-Americans on the jury, they are going to sympathize with Trayvon Martin more."

- Attorney Randy McClean

Photographs taken that night show Zimmerman with a broken nose, bruises and bloody cuts on the back of his head.

Law enforcement officials at the Seminole County Courthouse Monday had been anticipating scores of protesters supporting either Martin's family or Zimmerman. But so far the crowds had stayed away on the first day of the trial. Tierrel Mathis, a Florida A&M law student, was the sole person in a fenced-off area designated for protests and she didn't even describe herself as a protester. She said she merely wanted to observe the starts to one of the highest-profile trials in central Florida.

"I thought there would be mobs of people," Mathis said.

Talking to reporters, Martin's father, Tracy Martin, expressed relief that the trial was starting.

"We seek a fair and impartial trial," Tracy Martin said. "We ask that the community continue to stay peaceful as we place our faith in the justice system."

The case is expected to last about six weeks. If convicted, Zimmerman faces life in prison.

Prosecutors are expected to argue Zimmerman racially profiled Trayvon Martin. They also are expected to say he started the fight and was a would-be police officer overstepping his authority as a watch captain, patrolling the Orlando-area community where he and the fiancée of Martin's father lived.

"The state's narrative is going to be ... Zimmerman was a powerful neighborhood watchman, a wanna-be officer who liked to use his authority," said Randy McClean, a Florida defense attorney.

Investigators know Zimmerman was on patrol following a series of break-ins inside the Sanford, Fla., community. And they know  the altercation occurred as Martin, visiting from the Miami area, was returning from a convenience store where had bought Skittles and an iced tea and that he was on a cellphone call to a female friend immediately before the altercation.

But other details and accounts of that night remain in dispute and are expected to be the focal points of the court arguments.

Prosecutors say Zimmerman tracked down Martin and started the fight.

Zimmerman says Martin spotted his gun holstered around his waist and under his clothes and said, "You are going to die tonight."

He also says Martin grabbed the gun first and fired. Martin was shot in the chest at close range and died at the scene.

Under Florida law, a person can lawfully shoot somebody in self-defense to prevent their own death or great bodily harm.

The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that while Zimmerman's actions weren't premeditated, they demonstrated a "depraved mind" that didn't consider the threat his actions had toward human life.

O'Mara will need to show his client feared for his life and that race was not a factor in following Martin or shooting the teen, whose head was partially covered by a hoodie.  

"O'Mara's challenge is to show Trayvon wasn't profiled, that Zimmerman either saw something that looked suspicious or something else that caused him to make contact with Trayvon," McClean also said.

Zimmerman was well known to police dispatchers for his regular calls to report suspicious people and events and was told the night of the shooting to stay inside his vehicle.

Few residents have been able to give investigators a good description of what happened, and several offered conflicting accounts of who was on top of whom during the struggle.

But 911 calls made by neighbors captured cries for help during the fight and then the gunshot. Martin's parents say the cries for help were from their son, while Zimmerman's father has testified they were from his son. Voice-recognition experts could play an important role in helping jurors decide who was screaming, provided they are allowed to testify. O'Mara had raised questions about whether such prosecution experts would mislead jurors and Circuit Judge Debra Nelson has yet to rule on his concerns.

For days, the Trayvon Martin shooting received no attention beyond some small items in the local news media. Sanford police, after questioning Zimmerman, let him go and local prosecutors chose not to press charges right away.

That changed after Martin's parents hired a prominent civil rights attorney. He began complaining to the news media, accusing the police and prosecutors of letting the murderer of a black child go free, and contacting other civil rights leaders, including Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, to get their support.

Those events sparked protests in Sanford and around the country, with thousands demanding that Zimmerman be prosecuted. Gov. Rick Scott appointed State Attorney Angela B. Corey from the nearby Jacksonville district to re-examine the case.

Forty-four days after Martin's death, Corey charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder and had him arrested. For the past year, Zimmerman has been free on $1 million bond and living in seclusion. His defense is being paid by private contributions through a website O'Mara set up.

O'Mara has decided not to invoke a "stand your ground" hearing in which a judge alone would decide whether to dismiss the case or allow it to proceed to trial.

"This case, in my opinion and in my view of the facts, is a clear, straightforward self-defense case based upon the forensic evidence," he said.

Nelson has already ruled that defense attorneys won't be able to mention Martin's past marijuana use, suspension from school and past fighting during opening statements, though Nelson left open the possibility that the defense could try again later during the trial if it could show relevance.

Such a situation could arise if prosecutors attempt to portray Martin as an angelic kid.

Jurors will want to hear from Zimmerman.

"I can't see how he doesn't [testify]," said David Hill, another Florida defense attorney. "He's the only one who can say `I was scared for my life and here's what happened.' "

Another crucial witness will be Martin's female friend, who was talking with him by cellphone.

She says Martin told her during that conversation that someone was following him and that she also heard a brief exchange between him and someone before the phone was cut off.

Martin was shot shortly afterward. But O'Mara already has called into question her credibility, accusing her of lying about missing Martin's funeral because she was in the hospital.

O'Mara said he doubts he will find six jurors and four alternates who haven't heard about the case, but his goal is to find jurors who haven't formed opinions. The judge ruled that potential jurors' identities will stay anonymous in an effort to protect them from harassment and public pressure during the trial. She rejected a defense request to sequester the jury candidates during jury selection.

The defense will have a better chance with the jury if its members are older, more conservative citizens who believe in the right to bear arms, said both Hill and McClean.

"If there are African-Americans on the jury, they are going to sympathize with Trayvon Martin more," McClean said.

Prosecutors have refused to comment about the case outside the courtroom, but lead prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda indicated at a recent hearing he was well aware of the pressures the case's high profile is putting on all parties involved. Reporters from national media groups are attending the trial, and areas outside the courthouse have been designated for expected protests.

"We want to make sure this trial is tried in a courtroom and not outside a courtroom," de la Rionda said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Kredit: www.nst.com.my

Ahad, 9 Jun 2013

NST Online Business Times : latest

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

NST Online Business Times : latest


Bursa Malaysia opens higher

Posted: 09 Jun 2013 07:09 PM PDT

KUALA LUMPUR: Bursa Malaysia opened higher this morning, extending gains from last week, boosted by strong buying interest led by banking heavyweights, dealers said.

At 9.02 am, the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBM KLCI) was 5.9 points higher at 1,781.49 after opening 4.58 points better at 1,780.17.

A dealer said Bursa Malaysia and most regional stock markets received a boost after the US posted a better-than-expected May payrolls data.

Banking heavyweights, CIMB rose nine sen to RM8.25, Maybank added two sen to RM10.46 and Public Bank perked four sen to RM17.02 and contributed 1.774 points to the composite index.

Market breadth was positive with 231 gainers, 18 losers, 98 counters were unchanged, 1,241 untraded and 15 others were suspended. Turnover stood at 63.146 million shares worth RM27.058 million.

On the scoreboard, the Finance Index surged 75.8 points to 17,013.13, the Industrial Index rose 8.36 points to 3,036.16 while the Plantation Index shed 0.72 of a point to 8,339.99.

The FBM Emas Index added 49.77 points to 12,436.89, the FBMT100 clinched 45.88 points to 12,186.89, the FBM Mid 70 Index jumped 76.76 points to 14,441.81 and the FBM Ace Index advanced 59.44 points to 4,746.68. Among actives, RGB International gained one sen to 12.5 sen, Global Oriental inched up half-a-sen to 86 sen while Patimas Computers, Luster Industries and MAS were flat at six sen, 22 sen and 33 sen, respectively.

Heavyweights, Axiata Group added two sen to RM6.72, Petronas Chemicals was four sen higher at RM6.64, Maxis gained one sen to RM6.76 while Sime Darby and TNB were flat at RM9.49 and RM8.29, respectively. -- BERNAMA

Kredit: www.nst.com.my

NST Online Top Stories - Google News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

NST Online Top Stories - Google News


French Open 2013: Rafael Nadal v David Ferrer, live - Telegraph.co.uk

Posted: 09 Jun 2013 09:01 AM PDT

16.46 Rafa lifts his trophy. He's fairly pleased with that.

16.44 David Ferrer up first to receive his first loser's prize off Bolt. He does the famous Bolt pose. Only kidding, he looks crushed and pretty unhappy.

16.41 The two tennis players seem overcome by emotion after that match. Will John Inverdale, ITV's anchor, break down in tears a la the Olympics?

16.38 The French Open trophy will be presented by none other than Olympic and world champion sprinter Usain Bolt. And, remember, if Nadal bites any metal I trash the office and shut down the blog.

16.31 Nadal makes history becoming the first man to win a Grand Slam event on eight occasions.

All-time Grand Slam winners:

Roger Federer 17
Australian Open 4
French Open 1
Wimbledon 7
US Open 5

Peter Sampras 14
Australian Open 2
French Open 0
Wimbledon 7
US Open 5

Roy Emerson 12
Australian Open 6
French Open 2
Wimbledon 2
US Open 2

Rafael Nadal 12
Australian Open 1
French Open 8
Wimbledon 2
US Open 1

16.27 Nadal drops to his knees and holds his head in his hands. He has dug deep to win this and he's releasing the emotions:

16.23 Nadal* 6-3 6-2 6-3 Ferrer
Nadal is serving for the match. Some brief resistance from Ferrer flounders as Nadal races to 40-15 with two championship points. History about to be made.... AND NADAL DOES IT!

16.18 Nadal 6-3 6-2 5-3 Ferrer*
Sublime start to this eighth game of the set from Nadal. He crushes a return shot well beyond Ferrer's reach to put his opponent on the back foot immediately. But Ferrer, the little pony or whatever they call him, still refuses to give up getting the game to 30-30. Nadal's brilliance gets him a break point but a fearless forehand from Ferrer - that really looks to have irked Nadal - brings the game to deuce. Nadal prevails, though and he breaks Ferrer's service to win the game.

16.13 Nadal* 6-3 6-2 4-3 Ferrer
The French crowd partakes an impromptu spell of chanting. DA-VEED! DA-VEED! DA-VEED! It works - he wins the first point. The points come thick and fast and we're left Even Stevens at deuce. But not for long. Rafa wins the last two points in double-quick time to edge ever closer to an eighth title.

16.12 A mail from Alison:

E-mailHe should come to the Middle East as the Al-jazeera commentators are great. Though of course there are other hazards out here.

16.07 Nadal 6-3 6-2 3-3 Ferrer*
Ferrer with the service. What can he do? Some error-strewn tennis from Ferrer sees Nadal rush into a 30-0 lead before we're treated to some light comic relief courtesy of a hayfever-suffering patron in the crowd. The sneezes delay Ferrer's serve and everyone enjoys a laugh and smile. That lack of Benadryl from the patron seems to have inspired Ferrer as he recovers to hold his serve and win the game. We're level in the set again.

16.05 Nadal* 6-3 6-2 3-2 Ferrer
After a couple of dodgy games we are treated to the return of the Real McRafa, as he wins the most straightforward of games. I think it's possible we are back on the victory march here, folks.

16.04 An enjoyable romp of an email from Richard:

E-mailYep. But I'm losing the will to live thanks to the commentary team on ITV. Your question really ought to be: Are these the most anodyne, utterly dull commentators ever to inhabit a press box anywhere, ever?

Shame there is no way to just get the sound effects and none of their mind-numbing dross... I mean, a piece on racquet stringing? According to Wikipedia, Jim Courier is, and I quote, "...known for having an extensive knowledge of tennis racquets and strings." Well, as Courier is a four time Grand Slam winner, I should bl**dy hope so, but inflict this dross on us?!

And as for the Doughnut of Doom. Oh Lord.

Yours, about to watch Come Dine with Me over on C4...or anything.

15.59 Nadal 6-3 6-2 2-2 Ferrer*
The rain has returned. And play has been stopped. The players aren't off court. But they're not playing. They're sitting under brollies. Then all of a sudden Rafa leaps off his chair and demands they restart play. Ferrer digs his buttocks into his chair and refuses to play. But the umpire relents and we're restarting. Ferrer to serve. Outstanding backhand from Ferrer gets him to 30-0. And that's followed by another that helps him to 40-0. An error from Nadal off the next serve means Ferrer has pulled back to level terms in this set.

15.56 Nadal* 6-3 6-2 2-1 Ferrer
Some welcome resistance from Ferrer as he digs in and wins two rare points. If he's planning on launching a late comeback I think he's left it a dash too late. Just saying. But I think we can say that there's still (just about) life in this final as Ferrer supplements those earlier points with two more to take the game. Broadcasters cut to that suit with the radio again as fears over rain return. Brollies are well and truly up at Rolland Garros.

15.55 Nadal 6-3 6-2 2-0 Ferrer*
More pain for Ferrer as Nadal cruises to another staightforward game victory.

15.49 Nadal* 6-3 6-2 1-0 Ferrer
I'm a big fan of Nadal's trainers. Anyone else like them? Can you wear them as general leisure shoes...or do you actually have to play tennis in them? Raaaa-fa (I'm pronouncing it like an American now) with another sublime spot of tennis to absolutely walk that game. He's on the victory march! Here's a pic of that flare from earlier:

15.46 Nadal 6-3 6-2 Ferrer*
You know those games where Nadal is just completely unplayable and cruises to victory in the blink of an eye. That was one of them. Nadal wins the second set.

15.44 Look who it is! Bet he wishes he was in London though:

15.39 Nadal* 6-3 5-2 Ferrer
Nadal serving for the second set but before he can get round to it the security are thrown into action as a man with a lit red flare comes onto the court! DRAMA! He's hauled off the court immediately by security but there's clearly a lot of idiotic protesters out in the French capital today. The flare-wielding protester seems to have put Nadal off his game and he slumps to 15-40 down off his own serve. Could that barmy protester have inadvertently aided Ferrer? Yes! He wins the game.

15.30 Nadal 6-3 5-1 Ferrer*
There's significantly less umbrellas up now. But still quite a few ponchos, and fully-done-up macintoshes. Go figure. "Ferrer is coming hard for him," says Courier. Haha. The game is momentarily disrupted as two protesters raising placards related to "children's rights" are removed from the grandstand for excessive heckling. Are Nadal and Ferrer anti-children's rights? Back to the tennis. And Nadal has two break points. Ferrer pulls it back to deuce. Feels like now or never for the little guy. And it will probably be never! Nadal breaks Ferrer's serve and takes the game.

15.18 Nadal* 6-3 4-1 Ferrer
"We all have our routines at the start of the working day," says commentator Mullins in reference to Nadal and his superstitions. Mail me with your routines at the start of the working day. Back to the tennis, meanwhile, and Ferrer has two break points. Ah, make that one break point. Make that no break points. Commentator Mullins says of Ferrer "they call him the 'Little Terrier'. He's an enormous warrior". Can you be both a cute little dog and an enormous warrior? If so, I want photographic evidence. This game is too-ing and fro-ing. This game is too-ing and fro-ing until Nadal makes an intervention that you feel could kill off Ferrer, fully crush his morale. A 29-shot rally ends with a Nadal forehand to move the game back to deuce. And from deuce comes advantage, and then, welll you know the rest.....Nadal in full control.

15.09 Nadal 6-3 3-1 Ferrer*
The rain continues to fall and the broadcasters keep cutting to some suit, who is holding a radio to his ear. I assume said suit makes a decision about whether the players go off for rain. I really hope they don't. I have beers to drink at home and the New Girl season two box-set to watch. Plus it's always jolly enjoyable to see a dominant sportsperson drub their opponent. The official French Open feed has described the rain as "light drizzle" but I see many, many umbrellas open in the stands:

Great work from Ferrer as he holds his serve and wins his first game for some time. Not over yet. (Legal disclaimer: may be over but, heck, he's got to win some, right?)

15.07 I've just seen an extraordinary stat that claims Nadal is 69-0 when winning 1st set on clay. Doesn't bode well for Ferrer.

15.06 Nadal* 6-3 3-0 Ferrer
There's rain falling. Will this force Nadal into fifth gear? It looks that way. I look down at my keyboard for five seconds and Nadal has already raced into a 40-0 lead in this game. And that's game. He's pulling away from Ferrer.

15.02 Nadal 6-3 2-0 Ferrer*
Nadal is stepping on the gas in this match. A decent ding-dong gets the game to 30-all until Nadal produces an epic backhand that moves so fast, and so accurately that Ferrer has no chance to even move an inch before it clatters the clay and bounces out of reach. Nadal breaks for the game. He wants this done before the rain.

People whinge about female grunters in elite-level tennis but, crikey, these two fellas make a lot of noise. Something I really don't trust about grunters. Deserves mockery:

15.01 Can we swap, Mick?

14.55 Nadal* 6-3 1-0 Ferrer
Right, let's get on with the second set. Plain sailing for Rafa? Nah uh! Ferrer's out of the traps with two quick-fire points that show this l'il guy isn't out of this yet. I forgot to add that that last set was the first one Ferrer had lost all tournament. Reality check. Ferrer has break point, which seems to instantly spark Nadal into action. He enters the Matrix (my way of describing a period of deep concentration) and comes out the other side with advantage. Ferrer drops a backhand into the net and that's Rafa off the mark in this set.

14.50 Nadal 6 - Ferrer* 3
Ferrer doesn't win that many points off his first serve, which isn't great considering he's completing 70 per cent of his first serves. Extra evidence supplied from the first point of this game that Nadal wins off his compatriot's first serve. Two set points for Nadal...... And there it is!! Game and set Nadal!

14.42 Nadal* 5 - Ferrer 3
Ferrer is so darn cute plucky. He's received a couple of blows but he always dusts himself off and gets back to work with a positive attitude. He begins this game by nicking a point off Rafa. There are some signs of openings in the game, some little glimpses of light. But then big ol' Rafa comes along and shuts them down. Until..........deuce! Well done, David! Masterful shot that leaves Nadal flat-footed and unable to cover the ground in time. Meanwhile The Sunday Telegraph gets a shout-out on air from commentator Nick Mullins. Woo. Back to the tennis and a pinpoint serve on deuce hands Nadal a game point. And there it is! An ace! And a topsy-turvy game goes the way of Nadal.

A mail from Ben:

E-mailToo easy. Rafa owns this court

14.37 Nadal 4 - Ferrer* 3
For a wee lad he really moves around the court, does Ferrer. He strains every sinew to slam the ball beyond Nadal's reach for the first point of the game. You can't help but like Ferrer. The little man that did. Bless him. But then Rafa goes and makes it harder for him by unleashing his fearsome forehand. To snatch back three consecutive points. "His volley is a brick," says Courier. Ha. Funny description. Rafa then has two break points but Ferrer digs those child-like nails in to bring it back to deuce. That brief flicker of hope is shut down by Nadal, who wins back-to-back points to take the game.

14.33 Nadal* 3 - Ferrer 3
ITV running Burger King ads in the break between games. I must say I'm more interested in consuming the King of the Day than I am in picking up a racket right now. This is more like the Rafa i know and adore. Serves full of aggression and power and meaningful and menacing returns. If I could post clips of sounds coming from my mouth right now they would resemble purrs. That was a dominant game from Nadal. Simply done.

14.28 Nadal 2 - Ferrer* 3
Jim Courier talking on ITV about a "really interesting piece" they did for the channel with Rafa Nadal's racket stringer. I'm struggling to see how that could possibly be interesting. But anyway, here's some more tennis for ya. Can Ferrer consolidate after that gutsy break? Main commentator Nick Mullins now talking up this stringer feature ITV did. Is this unmissable television? The new Game of Thrones? Cracking work at the baseline, and net, from Ferrer sees him win that game. What have you got in response, Rafa?

14.28 Nadal 2* - Ferrer 2
Now then! Early break for Rafa. Can he pile on the pain? Not necessarily....Ferrer digs and produces some gutsy tennis to leave Rafa rattled. With the scores at 30-all he hits the net with his first serve before another loose mistake - a pulled wide return - leaves Ferrer with a break point. But Ferrer lets him off the hook with a poor second serve and an unforced error to bring it back to deuce. A joyful rally between the two Spaniards follows but it's Ferrer who takes the advantage with a laser-like backhand. And Ferrer breaks! Oh, it's on!

14.20 Nadal 2 - Ferrer 1*
Well done, Rafa. Supreme athleticism. Ferrer's throwing everything at him but he crouches, unfurls one of his Inspector Gadget limbs and clips the ball over the net. This is what you're up against with Nadal. That was a sign of things to come, because Rafa wins two further points off Ferrer's serve to set up two break points. And he breaks on the first opportunity. Some slightly less than brilliant serving from Ferrer instantly punished.

14.17 Nadal 1* - Ferrer 1
Rafa's serve is looking in pretty good condition but that Ferrer fitness that Murray spoke of before this watch is in full evidence as he makes Nadal work for every point. Ah ha, Ferrer wins a point off Rafa. The first point won off an opponent's serve today. Well done, David. You get a gold star. But you don't get the game, I'm afraid.

14.14 Nadal 0 - Ferrer 1*
That's some sharp serving from Ferrer. He wins the first game with the minimum of fuss and receives a bout of warm applause from the Paris crowd for his troubles. First sign that Ferrer has absolutely no intention of rolling over and letting Nadal walk this.

14.08 It's only 16 degrees in Paris. Brrrrr. Wrap up, y'all.

14.06 They've knocked up and we're almost ready to go. Cannot. Wait.

14.02 Rafa just drained a carbohydrate gel pouch. Or was it a Frube?

14.00 The two Spaniards have emerged from their locker rooms. Both wearing headbands, both tanned, both with slick/grease on their hair, and both Spanish. How will we tell them apart?

13.55 Andy Murray has spoken about Nadal:

Quote It's incredible, it's something I don't think we'll see for a very long time in the sport. He's still got a few years left in him so he could go even further. Rafa creates so much angle on that big court that he makes it very tough for Ferrer. But Ferrer's one of the fittest guys on the tour and he'll make Rafa work. But, yes, Rafa is the favourite.

13.45 Just a prior warning. If Nadal so much as puts a trophy or medal anywhere near his teeth today, I'll trash the Telegraph Sport office and shut down the blog. OK?

13.44 Have a stat:

13.42 Oh, look. It's Serena. Just casually posing with a trophy by the Eiffel Tower, while simultaneously exposing her impressive abdominal muscles. Good work, Getty Images.

13.35 Some pre-match thoughts from Simon Briggs:

The bookmakers are quoting Nadal at 8-1 on, which makes him a stronger favourite than Serena Williams was for the women's final on Saturday. But could all this easy assumption turn out to be misguided? Might this be the year when Ferrer shows himself to be more than a pale imitation of his more famous rival?

There are reasons to be cheerful about this match, and to suspect that it will be more than just a casual beat down in the mould of last year's semi-final between these players, which lasted just 106 minutes and finished in a 6-2, 6-2, 6-1 scoreline. For one thing, Ferrer has a perfect record in this tournament to date – 18 sets won, none lost – where Nadal has come under threat in the majority of his matches. For another, he has spent 11 hours on the court, where Nadal has been out there for 17.

13.24 Liveblog post in which I compare the two players in a head-to-head:


Rafael Nadal
David Ferrer
Age
27
31
Matches won
19
4
Career titles
56
20
Grand Slam titles
11
0
French Open titles
7
0
Titles this season
6
2

13.17 I could offer a prediciton, but then who am I? Let's leave it to the experts. Here's Boris Becker's verdict:

13.05 ITV pundit and former world No 1 Jim Courier has some advice for David Ferrer, which he believes could result in an upset if it is strictly followed:

The outsider can win Sunday's final, but only if he finds his best game and avoids Rafa's forehand. Also....

1 Stay high on the court

2 Use the serve

3 Return to the backhand side

4 Keep Nadal out there

13.00 Good afternoon and thanks for joining me for a bout of live tennis. There's two toned, tanned Spaniards, a court covered in clay and the chance of Rafael Nadal setting a new record.

Yes, everyone's favourite Spaniard called Rafa, after Mr Benitez of course, could become the first man to win a Grand Slam singles title eight times. That's pretty good going, don't you think? It will be his 12th overall, and his 13th if you include that shiny gold medal he won, and presumably pretended to bite in a cringeworthy post-match photo shoot, at the Beijing 2008 Olympics.

Hooray for Rafa and hooray for us. We've got an afternoon of tennis ahead of us. And everyone likes tennis, right? RIGHT? Enough rambling. Let's begin the preview part of this liveblog.

GOP's Ayotte says she'll support Senate immigration bill - NBCNews.com

Posted: 09 Jun 2013 08:26 AM PDT

By Carrie Dann, NBC News

GOP Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire will support the comprehensive immigration bill drafted by the bipartisan "Gang of Eight," she said Sunday, saying the legislation offers a "tough but fair" path to citizenship for the nation's estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants.  

Conservative opposition to the bipartisan "Gang of Eight," immigration bill was on full display in the Senate. Voto Latino's Maria Teresa Kumar discusses.

"This is a thoughtful bipartisan solution to a tough problem," she said on CBS's Face the Nation. "And so that's why I'm going to support it."

An additional Republican vote is welcome news for proponents of the bill, which was drafted by a bipartisan group of eight senators and will be debated on the Senate floor starting this week. 

The bill will need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. 

Ayotte joins the four Republican members of the Gang of Eight who are pushing for passage, although Florida Sen. Marco Rubio has suggested that he will only support the final legislation if more border security measures are written into the bill. 

In an op-ed on her Senate website, Ayotte said she will back amendments to beef up border security. 

"Consistent with my priorities, the legislation includes more border agents, more fencing, and better surveillance technology," she wrote. "And during the upcoming debate, I will support strengthening the legislation's border security measures even further."

This story was originally published on

Kredit: www.nst.com.my

Sabtu, 8 Jun 2013

NST Online Top Stories - Google News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

NST Online Top Stories - Google News


NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily - The Guardian

Posted: 06 Jun 2013 03:06 AM PDT

Phone records data
Under the terms of the order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data and the time and duration of all calls. Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP

The National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America's largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.

The order, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, requires Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis" to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries.

The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

The secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Fisa) granted the order to the FBI on April 25, giving the government unlimited authority to obtain the data for a specified three-month period ending on July 19.

Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

The disclosure is likely to reignite longstanding debates in the US over the proper extent of the government's domestic spying powers.

Under the Bush administration, officials in security agencies had disclosed to reporters the large-scale collection of call records data by the NSA, but this is the first time significant and top-secret documents have revealed the continuation of the practice on a massive scale under President Obama.

The unlimited nature of the records being handed over to the NSA is extremely unusual. Fisa court orders typically direct the production of records pertaining to a specific named target who is suspected of being an agent of a terrorist group or foreign state, or a finite set of individually named targets.

The Guardian approached the National Security Agency, the White House and the Department of Justice for comment in advance of publication on Wednesday. All declined. The agencies were also offered the opportunity to raise specific security concerns regarding the publication of the court order.

The court order expressly bars Verizon from disclosing to the public either the existence of the FBI's request for its customers' records, or the court order itself.

"We decline comment," said Ed McFadden, a Washington-based Verizon spokesman.

The order, signed by Judge Roger Vinson, compels Verizon to produce to the NSA electronic copies of "all call detail records or 'telephony metadata' created by Verizon for communications between the United States and abroad" or "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls".

The order directs Verizon to "continue production on an ongoing daily basis thereafter for the duration of this order". It specifies that the records to be produced include "session identifying information", such as "originating and terminating number", the duration of each call, telephone calling card numbers, trunk identifiers, International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) number, and "comprehensive communication routing information".

The information is classed as "metadata", or transactional information, rather than communications, and so does not require individual warrants to access. The document also specifies that such "metadata" is not limited to the aforementioned items. A 2005 court ruling judged that cell site location data – the nearest cell tower a phone was connected to – was also transactional data, and so could potentially fall under the scope of the order.

While the order itself does not include either the contents of messages or the personal information of the subscriber of any particular cell number, its collection would allow the NSA to build easily a comprehensive picture of who any individual contacted, how and when, and possibly from where, retrospectively.

It is not known whether Verizon is the only cell-phone provider to be targeted with such an order, although previous reporting has suggested the NSA has collected cell records from all major mobile networks. It is also unclear from the leaked document whether the three-month order was a one-off, or the latest in a series of similar orders.

The court order appears to explain the numerous cryptic public warnings by two US senators, Ron Wyden and Mark Udall, about the scope of the Obama administration's surveillance activities.

For roughly two years, the two Democrats have been stridently advising the public that the US government is relying on "secret legal interpretations" to claim surveillance powers so broad that the American public would be "stunned" to learn of the kind of domestic spying being conducted.

Because those activities are classified, the senators, both members of the Senate intelligence committee, have been prevented from specifying which domestic surveillance programs they find so alarming. But the information they have been able to disclose in their public warnings perfectly tracks both the specific law cited by the April 25 court order as well as the vast scope of record-gathering it authorized.

Julian Sanchez, a surveillance expert with the Cato Institute, explained: "We've certainly seen the government increasingly strain the bounds of 'relevance' to collect large numbers of records at once — everyone at one or two degrees of separation from a target — but vacuuming all metadata up indiscriminately would be an extraordinary repudiation of any pretence of constraint or particularized suspicion." The April order requested by the FBI and NSA does precisely that.

The law on which the order explicitly relies is the so-called "business records" provision of the Patriot Act, 50 USC section 1861. That is the provision which Wyden and Udall have repeatedly cited when warning the public of what they believe is the Obama administration's extreme interpretation of the law to engage in excessive domestic surveillance.

In a letter to attorney general Eric Holder last year, they argued that "there is now a significant gap between what most Americans think the law allows and what the government secretly claims the law allows."

"We believe," they wrote, "that most Americans would be stunned to learn the details of how these secret court opinions have interpreted" the "business records" provision of the Patriot Act.

Privacy advocates have long warned that allowing the government to collect and store unlimited "metadata" is a highly invasive form of surveillance of citizens' communications activities. Those records enable the government to know the identity of every person with whom an individual communicates electronically, how long they spoke, and their location at the time of the communication.

Such metadata is what the US government has long attempted to obtain in order to discover an individual's network of associations and communication patterns. The request for the bulk collection of all Verizon domestic telephone records indicates that the agency is continuing some version of the data-mining program begun by the Bush administration in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attack.

The NSA, as part of a program secretly authorized by President Bush on 4 October 2001, implemented a bulk collection program of domestic telephone, internet and email records. A furore erupted in 2006 when USA Today reported that the NSA had "been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth" and was "using the data to analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity." Until now, there has been no indication that the Obama administration implemented a similar program.

These recent events reflect how profoundly the NSA's mission has transformed from an agency exclusively devoted to foreign intelligence gathering, into one that focuses increasingly on domestic communications. A 30-year employee of the NSA, William Binney, resigned from the agency shortly after 9/11 in protest at the agency's focus on domestic activities.

In the mid-1970s, Congress, for the first time, investigated the surveillance activities of the US government. Back then, the mandate of the NSA was that it would never direct its surveillance apparatus domestically.

At the conclusion of that investigation, Frank Church, the Democratic senator from Idaho who chaired the investigative committee, warned: "The NSA's capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter."

Additional reporting by Ewen MacAskill and Spencer Ackerman

FBI, police probe gunman in Santa Monica shooting spree - Los Angeles Times

Posted: 08 Jun 2013 07:43 AM PDT

The FBI joined local authorities on Saturday in seeking to determine a motive for a gunman's rampage that killed four people in Santa Monica.

The gunman, who was also fatally shot by police to end Friday's harrowing incident, has not been identified. But law enforcement sources said his first victims were his father and brother, whose bodies were found in a burning home.

The sources said they believe those deaths appeared to be tied to a family dispute. But they stressed the investigation is still in its early stages.

Authorities said detectives were trying to look into the background of the alleged gunman as well as his family. They also want to know how he got the semiautomatic rifle he used.

Police are expected to hold a news conference Saturday morning.

The first signs of trouble came about 11:50 a.m. Friday, when gunshots rang out in the vicinity of Kansas and Yorkshire avenues, a quiet neighborhood nestled along the Santa Monica Freeway.

Jerry Cunningham-Rathner had just watched her son walk out the front door of her home a few minutes earlier when she heard the shots. She rushed outside, fearing he had been hit.

Instead, looking across the street, she saw a house engulfed in flames. A man standing in front of the house was dressed all in black, with an ammunition belt around his waist and a large rifle in his hands, she said.

"He looked like a SWAT officer," she said.

Firefighters later found the bodies of two men inside the house. Police sources, who requested anonymity because of the ongoing investigation, said the men were Samir Zawahri, 55, the owner of the house, and one of his adult sons. A second son is suspected of being the shooter, the sources said.

Cunningham-Rathner looked on in horror as two cars approached. The man pointed his weapon at the first, a Mazda hatchback, and yelled at the driver to stop. Cunningham-Rathner said he motioned for the woman driving the second car to keep moving. When she hesitated, the man opened fire on her silver Infiniti, wounding the driver slightly.

Laura Sisk, 41, the driver in the first car, froze, she later said. She knew President Obama was in town for an event a few miles away and thought momentarily the man might be a Secret Service agent. She quickly realized that wasn't the case.

"You're going to drive me to Santa Monica College and let me out," she recalled the gunman saying.

She begged him to take the car instead. "No. You're driving," he said.

Before getting into the passenger's seat next to Sisk, witnesses said, the gunman fired several shots aimlessly around the neighborhood with what authorities later said was an "AR-15 style" semiautomatic rifle.

Other than telling her where to turn, the man said little during the mile drive down Pico Boulevard toward the college campus, Sisk said. He was calm, she said.

Sisk said she was crying and shaking as she drove. The gunman reassured her. "He told me to calm down," she said. "He said he'd let me go if I didn't do anything stupid."

Near Cloverfield and Pico boulevards, the gunman fired at the outside of a public bus from front to back, shattering the windows. Passengers dived to the floor for cover, said Marta Fagerstroem, a student from Sweden, who was on the bus and studying for an exam.

A woman sitting in the back row was grazed in the head by a bullet, witnesses said.

"It happened so fast," said Fagerstroem, her voice quavering. "You don't expect this."

Kredit: www.nst.com.my
 

NST Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved